Reconstructing Islamic Education Learning Evaluation: Integrating Philosophical-Theological Foundations, Authentic Assessment, and Digital Transformation

Authors

  • Saidatun Nisa Nasution Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Serdang Bedagai Author

Keywords:

learning evaluation, Islamic religious education, digital transformation

Abstract

Learning evaluation in Islamic Religious Education (IRE) has long been criticized for its dominant orientation toward the cognitive domain, while affective, psychomotor, and spiritual dimensions, which are the essential core of Islamic education, remain marginalized. This study aims to reconstruct the concept of learning evaluation in IRE by examining three focal points: (1) the philosophical-theological foundation of holistic evaluation, (2) the implementation of authentic assessment as a response to the limitations of conventional evaluation, and (3) the opportunities and challenges of digital transformation in learning evaluation within the era of the Merdeka Curriculum and Society 5.0. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, in which data were collected from reputable national and international journal articles and academic books, then analyzed using thematic content analysis. The findings indicate that a holistic evaluation paradigm, one that integrates cognitive, affective, psychomotor, and spiritual domains, provides a stronger theological legitimacy for assessing the success of IRE learning. Authentic assessment, through techniques such as observation, portfolios, self-assessment, and reflective journals, proves capable of capturing the internalization of religious values that conventional tests cannot measure. Meanwhile, digital transformation offers efficiency and transparency in assessment, yet it simultaneously presents challenges related to teachers' digital literacy, infrastructure inequality, and the risk of reducing the spiritual meaning of assessment to mere technical automation. This study concludes that an ideal model of IRE learning evaluation must synergistically integrate these three dimensions to produce an assessment that is not only academically valid but also spiritually meaningful.

References

Amri. (2024). Authentic assessment of attitudes in Islamic religious education subjects in the formation of students' religious character at SMAN 7 Sijunjung. Ruhama: Islamic Education Journal. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/ruhama/article/view/5417

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206.

Hazirman, H., Nilawati, N., Lona, D., Putri, M., Susmita, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2026). Evaluasi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam: Konsep, prinsip, dan landasan evaluasi dalam perspektif Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/36044

Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Shahrill, M., & Jasmi, K. A. (2022). Digital literacy and Islamic education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6573–6592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10830-2

Idris, M., & Asyafah, A. (2020). Authentic assessment in Islamic education. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v3i1.36

JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research). (2026). The implementation of authentic assessment in improving learning outcomes in Islamic religious education: A study of students at SDN Trasak 2. https://ejournal.unisbablitar.ac.id/index.php/josar/article/view/5662

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Marno, M., & Tausih, T. U. (2021). Pelaksanaan penilaian ranah afektif menggunakan Google Form di era new normal. J-PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 7(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.18860/jpai.v7i2.12270

Maryani, S. (2023). Analisis metodologi penelitian kepustakaan dalam pendidikan agama Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 54–62.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muhaimin. (2009). Pendidikan Agama Islam (hlm. 150–158). Bumi Aksara.

Mustafa, M. A. (2024). The degree of implementation of authentic assessment strategies as estimated by Islamic education teachers. An-Najah University Journal for Research – B (Humanities), 38(7), 1309–1336. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247.38.7.2235

Proceeding of International Conference of Islamic Education. (2025). Integrating digital assessment in Islamic education within the Merdeka curriculum: A study case at SMP Negeri 2 Ngemplak. https://jurnal.iimsurakarta.ac.id/index.php/icie/article/view/857

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance (hlm. 40–56). Jossey-Bass.

Zainal Arifin. (2012). Evaluasi pendidikan: Teori dan aplikasi (hlm. 75–90). Pustaka Pelajar.

Published

12-06-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nasution, S. N. (2026). Reconstructing Islamic Education Learning Evaluation: Integrating Philosophical-Theological Foundations, Authentic Assessment, and Digital Transformation. TARBIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 28-35. https://jurnal.staiuisu.ac.id/index.php/tarbiyah/article/view/74